Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
287 lines (235 loc) · 22 KB

File metadata and controls

287 lines (235 loc) · 22 KB

Fide AI Research Ideas

This repository is Fide AI's public research commons: a place to propose, review, claim, and track research ideas about faith-facing AI systems.

Fide AI studies how AI systems reason, retrieve, and respond in contexts of theology, moral formation, religious education, family life, ministry workflows, and pastoral-adjacent care before high-trust communities rely on them. The goal of this repo is to make that research agenda visible, reviewable, and easy to join.

The companion website publishes a readable snapshot of these ideas at fideai.org/research/calls. This repository remains the source of truth for the research backlog, issue discussions, pull requests, and generated JSON feed.

Public Scope

Keep this repository focused on research ideas, public methodology, source reviews, collaboration needs, and claim boundaries. Do not include product-specific plans, customer or partner work, private GTM strategy, or company-internal implementation commitments here.

Current Snapshot

  • 71 open research ideas
  • 2 research tracks
  • 4 public research agendas that group the backlog into shareable research campaigns
  • 4 public issue paths for proposing ideas, claiming work, commenting on methodology, and volunteering as a reviewer
  • 1 generated feed at dist/research-ideas.json for the website and other downstream uses

Who This Is For

  • Churches, ministries, pastors, and Christian leaders who want AI adoption to be evaluated against real pastoral, theological, educational, and institutional needs.
  • Parents and educators who need better evidence about children, tutoring, companionship, disclosure, safety, and formation.
  • Theologians, clergy, ministry practitioners, and domain reviewers who can help define responsible boundaries and evaluate outputs.
  • AI researchers, engineers, and evaluation scientists who can turn ideas into benchmarks, harnesses, datasets, scoring protocols, and reproducible artifacts.
  • Funders and institutions who want to support public-interest evaluation infrastructure, reviewer panels, field pilots, and standards.

How to Participate

Use the lowest-friction path that fits your contribution:

  • Propose a new idea: open a Research idea issue.
  • Improve an existing idea: comment on the issue or open a pull request against the relevant file in ideas/.
  • Claim or help with an idea: open a Claim or help with an idea issue.
  • Volunteer as a reviewer: open a Reviewer interest issue.
  • Suggest controls or related work: open a Comment on methodology issue.
  • Start privately first: use the contact path on fideai.org/participate if your context involves a ministry, family, institution, or sensitive workflow that should not start in a public GitHub issue.

See CONTRIBUTING.md for the full contributor guide.

Research Tracks

Track Meaning
christian-church Explicitly designed to benefit the Christian church: churches, clergy, Christian educators, ministries, denominations, seminaries, publishers, and Christian families.
broader-faith-safety Relevant to faith communities, AI ethics, AI safety, evaluation science, governance, pluralism, or high-trust deployment more broadly, while still fitting under Fide AI's mission.

Research Agendas

The website organizes the public calls into four larger agendas. The agenda pages are not separate sources of truth; they are curated entry points over the idea briefs in this repository.

Agenda Public route Primary audience Included ideas
AI, work, meaning, and the common good /research/calls/work-meaning churches, economists, sociologists, funders FID-030, FID-033, FID-034, FID-037, FID-038, FID-040, FID-046-FID-055, FID-065
Pastoral care, spiritual companionship, and formation /research/calls/pastoral-formation pastors, churches, parents, educators, builders FID-003, FID-004, FID-010, FID-015, FID-016, FID-018, FID-025-FID-027, FID-035, FID-041, FID-042, FID-050, FID-052, FID-053, FID-068
Faith-facing AI evaluation infrastructure /research/calls/evaluation-infrastructure AI researchers, builders, reviewers, funders FID-001-FID-003, FID-006, FID-008, FID-011, FID-012, FID-023, FID-028, FID-044, FID-045, FID-070
Governance, authority, and religious representation /research/calls/governance-representation church leaders, ministries, safety researchers, interfaith reviewers FID-005-FID-007, FID-009, FID-013, FID-014, FID-017, FID-019-FID-025, FID-028, FID-029, FID-031, FID-032, FID-036, FID-039-FID-044, FID-064, FID-066, FID-067, FID-069, FID-071

Status Vocabulary

Status Public label Meaning
seed Open question A promising question or hypothesis, not yet scoped.
scoping Being shaped Being turned into a protocol, dataset, or collaborator plan.
ready-for-collaboration Needs contributors Clear enough for external contributors to help.
active In progress Currently being executed or written up.
paused Paused Valid idea, but blocked by capacity, funding, data, or review needs.
completed Completed Published, released, or superseded by a finished artifact.
retired Retired No longer a good fit or invalidated by evidence.

Repository Structure

README.md                     # Public orientation and idea index
CONTRIBUTING.md                # Detailed contributor and maintainer guide
CLAIMS_POLICY.md               # How to avoid overstating research ideas
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md             # Community expectations
research-landscape.md          # Broader question families and inspiration
research/                       # Structured evidence commons and source notes
research/formal-verification-faith-facing-ai.md
                                # Program note for the formal verification lane
research/funding-inspired-call-map.md
                                # How funding priorities informed selected calls
ideas/                         # One Markdown brief per research idea
templates/                     # Reusable templates for briefs, claims, and source notes
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/        # Public issue paths
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
.github/workflows/build-feed.yml
scripts/build-feed.mjs         # Builds dist/research-ideas.json
dist/research-ideas.json       # Generated public feed used by the website

Website Feed

The Fide AI website consumes dist/research-ideas.json at build time. When an idea brief changes, run:

npm run build:feed

Then include both the changed Markdown files and the updated dist/research-ideas.json in the pull request.

The feed currently includes the idea ID, title, status, track, primary need, summary, why-it-matters excerpt, ways to help, source path, and GitHub URL.

Research Evidence Commons

The research/ directory maintains a structured evidence commons for papers, benchmarks, datasets, reports, policy documents, theology sources, product documentation, and other prior work that should inform Fide AI research.

  • research/sources.yaml is the canonical source registry.
  • research/source-tags.yaml defines controlled tags for source relevance.
  • research/reviews/ contains short notes for reviewed high-priority sources.
  • templates/source-note.md is the template for adding a source review.

Use the evidence commons to connect prior work to idea IDs without overloading individual seed idea files with bibliographies. See research/README.md for the source schema, status vocabulary, contribution workflow, and claim boundaries.

For a disciplined map of selected external funding priorities to researchable questions, see research/funding-inspired-call-map.md.

License

This repo is intended for open research reuse.

  • Research ideas, documentation, issue templates, and other written materials are licensed under CC BY 4.0.
  • Code, scripts, workflow files, and machine-readable configuration are licensed under Apache 2.0.

See LICENSE.md for the full license summary. Reuse does not imply endorsement by Fide AI.

Near-Term Priorities

  1. Turn AI, work, meaning, and the common good into a field-ready research campaign around labor disruption, vocation, church support, household welfare, generosity, and access to AI benefits.
  2. Turn pastoral care, spiritual companionship, and formation into practical evaluation protocols for triage, escalation, overvalidation, dependency, devotional boundaries, youth formation, and embodied referral.
  3. Turn faith-facing AI evaluation infrastructure into repeatable public benchmarks, reviewer calibration studies, harness comparisons, red-team suites, and evidence commons infrastructure.
  4. Turn governance, authority, and religious representation into standards for institutional adoption, source authority, religious omission, persuasion boundaries, incident reporting, cross-faith measurement validity, and multi-principal agent delegation, revocation, and confidential memory.
  5. Develop formal verification for faith-facing AI as a cross-faith research program for sacred-text fidelity, proof-carrying citations, tradition-specific constraints, authority boundaries, verified retrieval, and reviewer-to-spec workflows.
  6. Develop AI, institutions, and collective discernment questions around local knowledge, plural association, collective intelligence, religious institutional futures, and youth practice design.

Idea Index

Christian Church Research

These ideas are explicitly intended to benefit the Christian church.

ID Idea Status Primary need Brief
FID-015 Sermon, liturgy, and religious teaching generation seed clergy, educators, source reviewers brief
FID-016 Youth, religious education, and AI guidance seed educators, child safety experts, policy reviewers brief
FID-017 Agentic ministry and institutional workflow risk seed agent evaluation, institutional operators brief
FID-025 AI and ecclesial authority seed ecclesiology, denominational polity, evaluation design brief
FID-026 AI prayer and devotional boundaries seed pastoral theology, liturgy, product review brief
FID-027 Christian formation over time seed discipleship, longitudinal study design, HAI research brief
FID-028 Christian source authority and RAG seed theological librarianship, RAG evaluation, denominational experts brief
FID-029 AI and Christian mission seed missiology, persuasion safety, interfaith review brief
FID-030 AI and Christian anthropology seed theological anthropology, eval design brief
FID-031 AI in church governance and discernment seed church leadership, governance, decision-support evaluation brief
FID-032 AI-generated Christian media, voice, and deepfakes seed media ethics, church communications, safety review brief
FID-046 AI displacement, meaning, and vocation seed labor economics, pastoral care, vocation, survey design brief
FID-047 Churches as labor-transition support institutions seed institutional partners, labor transition, social support, field research brief
FID-048 AI career guidance and vocational discernment seed career guidance, pastoral theology, HAI research, product evaluation brief
FID-049 Unequal AI access through faith communities seed access research, community partners, digital literacy, equity brief
FID-050 Youth career formation in an AI economy seed educators, youth ministry, career preparation, longitudinal study design brief
FID-054 Church signals of AI-era economic stress seed church partners, privacy governance, sociology, benevolence and care data brief
FID-055 AI disruption, generosity, and benevolence seed church finance, household welfare, philanthropy, economic sociology brief
FID-065 AI, local knowledge, and faith-based civil society seed civil-society research, organizational studies, political economy, faith-based partners brief
FID-067 Religious institutional futures in an AI-mediated society seed futures studies, sociology of religion, ecclesiology, organizational research, scenario design brief
FID-068 Christian practices for AI-era youth discernment seed youth and young-adult ministry, practical theology, developmental research, ethics review, HAI research brief

Broader Faith, Ethics, and Safety Research

These ideas are broader than the Christian church but still fit Fide AI's public mission.

ID Idea Status Primary need Brief
FID-001 Faith-facing model comparison platform scoping eval engineering brief
FID-002 FMG-Bench human calibration and construct validity active expert reviewers, statistics brief
FID-003 Held-out multi-turn pastoral pressure tests scoping scenario design, review brief
FID-004 Relational substitution risk in faith-facing AI seed theology, UX research brief
FID-005 Scripture, tradition, and moral-framing interventions seed eval design, replication brief
FID-006 Faith-facing retrieval grounding and citation reliability scoping RAG evaluation brief
FID-007 Tradition-specific disagreement and pluralism handling seed domain experts, rubric design brief
FID-008 Evaluation-awareness and faith-facing honesty tests seed red-team design brief
FID-009 Multimodal religious reasoning and sacred imagery seed multimodal evaluation brief
FID-010 Human agency, authority, and escalation benchmarks scoping pastoral/legal/clinical review brief
FID-011 Reviewer reliability for faith-facing AI evaluation scoping statistics, reviewer ops brief
FID-012 Optimization pressure and visible-rubric gaming seed eval science brief
FID-013 Religious representation and omission in everyday guidance seed benchmark design, domain reviewers brief
FID-014 Conversion and proselytization symmetry seed prompt design, interfaith review brief
FID-018 Spiritual companionship, dependency, and overvalidation seed pastoral care, psychology, HAI research brief
FID-019 Cross-lingual and minority-faith evaluation seed multilingual reviewers, dataset design brief
FID-020 Community co-design and faith-AI governance seed participatory design, institutional partners brief
FID-021 Post-deployment monitoring for faith-facing AI seed monitoring design, privacy review brief
FID-022 Procurement and readiness standards for faith institutions seed institutional policy, legal review brief
FID-023 Faith-facing red-team suite seed red-team design, safety reviewers brief
FID-024 Faith-AI incident database seed taxonomy design, reporting governance brief
FID-051 Economic disruption and religious meaning-seeking seed sociology of religion, labor economics, privacy-preserving measurement, aggregate usage analysis brief
FID-052 AI as private first counsel during economic stress seed pastoral care, HAI research, mental health boundaries, privacy-preserving measurement brief
FID-053 AI as bridge or substitute for faith community seed sociology of religion, pastoral care, UX research, aggregate and field measurement brief
FID-064 Collective intelligence and communal discernment under AI mediation seed computational social science, theology of discernment, network science, organizational research brief
FID-066 AI gatekeepers, conscience, and associational pluralism seed technology governance, law and religion, platform research, pluralism and safety review brief
FID-069 Verifiable delegation and revocation in multi-agent networks seed multi-agent safety, identity infrastructure, authorization, high-trust institutions brief
FID-070 Contextual integrity and prompt-injection resilience for faith-facing agents seed agent security, adversarial evaluation, context integrity, secure tool use brief
FID-071 Confidential agent memory and cross-context disclosure seed privacy-preserving AI, agent memory evaluation, data governance, high-trust systems brief

Formal Verification for Faith-Facing AI

These ideas are cross-faith by default and focus on source fidelity, bounded inference, formal constraints, and authority boundaries. Christian examples can serve as concrete pilots, but the methods should be useful across traditions where sacred texts, interpretive sources, and community authority matter.

See research/formal-verification-faith-facing-ai.md for the program note that maps these ideas into four buildable artifacts: a faith verification domain pack, a proof-carrying faith answer schema, a sacred text fidelity benchmark, and a reviewer-to-spec workflow.

ID Idea Status Primary need Brief
FID-056 Formal verification for sacred text fidelity seed formal methods, sacred text scholarship, citation evaluation brief
FID-057 Proof-carrying citations for faith-facing AI seed formal methods, RAG systems, evidence graphs, evaluator tooling brief
FID-058 Tradition-specific constraint formalization seed formal specification, theology, pluralism, evaluator design brief
FID-059 Authority-boundary verification for pastoral-adjacent AI seed authority boundaries, pastoral care, formal policy checks brief
FID-060 Cross-faith sacred text and source schema seed source metadata, corpus design, theological librarianship brief
FID-061 Theological contradiction and entailment stress tests seed natural language inference, theology review, benchmark design brief
FID-062 Verified retrieval pipelines for faith-facing RAG seed RAG evaluation, retrieval verification, source authority metadata brief
FID-063 Human-reviewer-to-formal-spec translation seed reviewer operations, formal specification, evaluation science brief

Claims Discipline

Research ideas are hypotheses and collaboration invitations. They are not Fide AI findings. A public claim requires a separate reviewed report, benchmark release, paper, or evidence artifact with methods, limitations, and named evaluation conditions.

Read CLAIMS_POLICY.md before citing, summarizing, or promoting an idea from this repository.