This repository is Fide AI's public research commons: a place to propose, review, claim, and track research ideas about faith-facing AI systems.
Fide AI studies how AI systems reason, retrieve, and respond in contexts of theology, moral formation, religious education, family life, ministry workflows, and pastoral-adjacent care before high-trust communities rely on them. The goal of this repo is to make that research agenda visible, reviewable, and easy to join.
The companion website publishes a readable snapshot of these ideas at
fideai.org/research/calls. This repository remains the source of truth for the
research backlog, issue discussions, pull requests, and generated JSON feed.
Keep this repository focused on research ideas, public methodology, source reviews, collaboration needs, and claim boundaries. Do not include product-specific plans, customer or partner work, private GTM strategy, or company-internal implementation commitments here.
- 71 open research ideas
- 2 research tracks
- 4 public research agendas that group the backlog into shareable research campaigns
- 4 public issue paths for proposing ideas, claiming work, commenting on methodology, and volunteering as a reviewer
- 1 generated feed at
dist/research-ideas.jsonfor the website and other downstream uses
- Churches, ministries, pastors, and Christian leaders who want AI adoption to be evaluated against real pastoral, theological, educational, and institutional needs.
- Parents and educators who need better evidence about children, tutoring, companionship, disclosure, safety, and formation.
- Theologians, clergy, ministry practitioners, and domain reviewers who can help define responsible boundaries and evaluate outputs.
- AI researchers, engineers, and evaluation scientists who can turn ideas into benchmarks, harnesses, datasets, scoring protocols, and reproducible artifacts.
- Funders and institutions who want to support public-interest evaluation infrastructure, reviewer panels, field pilots, and standards.
Use the lowest-friction path that fits your contribution:
- Propose a new idea: open a
Research ideaissue. - Improve an existing idea: comment on the issue or open a pull request
against the relevant file in
ideas/. - Claim or help with an idea: open a
Claim or help with an ideaissue. - Volunteer as a reviewer: open a
Reviewer interestissue. - Suggest controls or related work: open a
Comment on methodologyissue. - Start privately first: use the contact path on
fideai.org/participateif your context involves a ministry, family, institution, or sensitive workflow that should not start in a public GitHub issue.
See CONTRIBUTING.md for the full contributor guide.
| Track | Meaning |
|---|---|
christian-church |
Explicitly designed to benefit the Christian church: churches, clergy, Christian educators, ministries, denominations, seminaries, publishers, and Christian families. |
broader-faith-safety |
Relevant to faith communities, AI ethics, AI safety, evaluation science, governance, pluralism, or high-trust deployment more broadly, while still fitting under Fide AI's mission. |
The website organizes the public calls into four larger agendas. The agenda pages are not separate sources of truth; they are curated entry points over the idea briefs in this repository.
| Agenda | Public route | Primary audience | Included ideas |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI, work, meaning, and the common good | /research/calls/work-meaning |
churches, economists, sociologists, funders | FID-030, FID-033, FID-034, FID-037, FID-038, FID-040, FID-046-FID-055, FID-065 |
| Pastoral care, spiritual companionship, and formation | /research/calls/pastoral-formation |
pastors, churches, parents, educators, builders | FID-003, FID-004, FID-010, FID-015, FID-016, FID-018, FID-025-FID-027, FID-035, FID-041, FID-042, FID-050, FID-052, FID-053, FID-068 |
| Faith-facing AI evaluation infrastructure | /research/calls/evaluation-infrastructure |
AI researchers, builders, reviewers, funders | FID-001-FID-003, FID-006, FID-008, FID-011, FID-012, FID-023, FID-028, FID-044, FID-045, FID-070 |
| Governance, authority, and religious representation | /research/calls/governance-representation |
church leaders, ministries, safety researchers, interfaith reviewers | FID-005-FID-007, FID-009, FID-013, FID-014, FID-017, FID-019-FID-025, FID-028, FID-029, FID-031, FID-032, FID-036, FID-039-FID-044, FID-064, FID-066, FID-067, FID-069, FID-071 |
| Status | Public label | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
seed |
Open question | A promising question or hypothesis, not yet scoped. |
scoping |
Being shaped | Being turned into a protocol, dataset, or collaborator plan. |
ready-for-collaboration |
Needs contributors | Clear enough for external contributors to help. |
active |
In progress | Currently being executed or written up. |
paused |
Paused | Valid idea, but blocked by capacity, funding, data, or review needs. |
completed |
Completed | Published, released, or superseded by a finished artifact. |
retired |
Retired | No longer a good fit or invalidated by evidence. |
README.md # Public orientation and idea index
CONTRIBUTING.md # Detailed contributor and maintainer guide
CLAIMS_POLICY.md # How to avoid overstating research ideas
CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md # Community expectations
research-landscape.md # Broader question families and inspiration
research/ # Structured evidence commons and source notes
research/formal-verification-faith-facing-ai.md
# Program note for the formal verification lane
research/funding-inspired-call-map.md
# How funding priorities informed selected calls
ideas/ # One Markdown brief per research idea
templates/ # Reusable templates for briefs, claims, and source notes
.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/ # Public issue paths
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
.github/workflows/build-feed.yml
scripts/build-feed.mjs # Builds dist/research-ideas.json
dist/research-ideas.json # Generated public feed used by the website
The Fide AI website consumes dist/research-ideas.json at build time. When an
idea brief changes, run:
npm run build:feedThen include both the changed Markdown files and the updated
dist/research-ideas.json in the pull request.
The feed currently includes the idea ID, title, status, track, primary need, summary, why-it-matters excerpt, ways to help, source path, and GitHub URL.
The research/ directory maintains a structured evidence commons for papers,
benchmarks, datasets, reports, policy documents, theology sources, product
documentation, and other prior work that should inform Fide AI research.
research/sources.yamlis the canonical source registry.research/source-tags.yamldefines controlled tags for source relevance.research/reviews/contains short notes for reviewed high-priority sources.templates/source-note.mdis the template for adding a source review.
Use the evidence commons to connect prior work to idea IDs without overloading
individual seed idea files with bibliographies. See research/README.md for the
source schema, status vocabulary, contribution workflow, and claim boundaries.
For a disciplined map of selected external funding priorities to researchable
questions, see
research/funding-inspired-call-map.md.
This repo is intended for open research reuse.
- Research ideas, documentation, issue templates, and other written materials are licensed under CC BY 4.0.
- Code, scripts, workflow files, and machine-readable configuration are licensed under Apache 2.0.
See LICENSE.md for the full license summary. Reuse does not
imply endorsement by Fide AI.
- Turn AI, work, meaning, and the common good into a field-ready research campaign around labor disruption, vocation, church support, household welfare, generosity, and access to AI benefits.
- Turn pastoral care, spiritual companionship, and formation into practical evaluation protocols for triage, escalation, overvalidation, dependency, devotional boundaries, youth formation, and embodied referral.
- Turn faith-facing AI evaluation infrastructure into repeatable public benchmarks, reviewer calibration studies, harness comparisons, red-team suites, and evidence commons infrastructure.
- Turn governance, authority, and religious representation into standards for institutional adoption, source authority, religious omission, persuasion boundaries, incident reporting, cross-faith measurement validity, and multi-principal agent delegation, revocation, and confidential memory.
- Develop formal verification for faith-facing AI as a cross-faith research program for sacred-text fidelity, proof-carrying citations, tradition-specific constraints, authority boundaries, verified retrieval, and reviewer-to-spec workflows.
- Develop AI, institutions, and collective discernment questions around local knowledge, plural association, collective intelligence, religious institutional futures, and youth practice design.
These ideas are explicitly intended to benefit the Christian church.
| ID | Idea | Status | Primary need | Brief |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FID-015 |
Sermon, liturgy, and religious teaching generation | seed |
clergy, educators, source reviewers | brief |
FID-016 |
Youth, religious education, and AI guidance | seed |
educators, child safety experts, policy reviewers | brief |
FID-017 |
Agentic ministry and institutional workflow risk | seed |
agent evaluation, institutional operators | brief |
FID-025 |
AI and ecclesial authority | seed |
ecclesiology, denominational polity, evaluation design | brief |
FID-026 |
AI prayer and devotional boundaries | seed |
pastoral theology, liturgy, product review | brief |
FID-027 |
Christian formation over time | seed |
discipleship, longitudinal study design, HAI research | brief |
FID-028 |
Christian source authority and RAG | seed |
theological librarianship, RAG evaluation, denominational experts | brief |
FID-029 |
AI and Christian mission | seed |
missiology, persuasion safety, interfaith review | brief |
FID-030 |
AI and Christian anthropology | seed |
theological anthropology, eval design | brief |
FID-031 |
AI in church governance and discernment | seed |
church leadership, governance, decision-support evaluation | brief |
FID-032 |
AI-generated Christian media, voice, and deepfakes | seed |
media ethics, church communications, safety review | brief |
FID-046 |
AI displacement, meaning, and vocation | seed |
labor economics, pastoral care, vocation, survey design | brief |
FID-047 |
Churches as labor-transition support institutions | seed |
institutional partners, labor transition, social support, field research | brief |
FID-048 |
AI career guidance and vocational discernment | seed |
career guidance, pastoral theology, HAI research, product evaluation | brief |
FID-049 |
Unequal AI access through faith communities | seed |
access research, community partners, digital literacy, equity | brief |
FID-050 |
Youth career formation in an AI economy | seed |
educators, youth ministry, career preparation, longitudinal study design | brief |
FID-054 |
Church signals of AI-era economic stress | seed |
church partners, privacy governance, sociology, benevolence and care data | brief |
FID-055 |
AI disruption, generosity, and benevolence | seed |
church finance, household welfare, philanthropy, economic sociology | brief |
FID-065 |
AI, local knowledge, and faith-based civil society | seed |
civil-society research, organizational studies, political economy, faith-based partners | brief |
FID-067 |
Religious institutional futures in an AI-mediated society | seed |
futures studies, sociology of religion, ecclesiology, organizational research, scenario design | brief |
FID-068 |
Christian practices for AI-era youth discernment | seed |
youth and young-adult ministry, practical theology, developmental research, ethics review, HAI research | brief |
These ideas are broader than the Christian church but still fit Fide AI's public mission.
| ID | Idea | Status | Primary need | Brief |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FID-001 |
Faith-facing model comparison platform | scoping |
eval engineering | brief |
FID-002 |
FMG-Bench human calibration and construct validity | active |
expert reviewers, statistics | brief |
FID-003 |
Held-out multi-turn pastoral pressure tests | scoping |
scenario design, review | brief |
FID-004 |
Relational substitution risk in faith-facing AI | seed |
theology, UX research | brief |
FID-005 |
Scripture, tradition, and moral-framing interventions | seed |
eval design, replication | brief |
FID-006 |
Faith-facing retrieval grounding and citation reliability | scoping |
RAG evaluation | brief |
FID-007 |
Tradition-specific disagreement and pluralism handling | seed |
domain experts, rubric design | brief |
FID-008 |
Evaluation-awareness and faith-facing honesty tests | seed |
red-team design | brief |
FID-009 |
Multimodal religious reasoning and sacred imagery | seed |
multimodal evaluation | brief |
FID-010 |
Human agency, authority, and escalation benchmarks | scoping |
pastoral/legal/clinical review | brief |
FID-011 |
Reviewer reliability for faith-facing AI evaluation | scoping |
statistics, reviewer ops | brief |
FID-012 |
Optimization pressure and visible-rubric gaming | seed |
eval science | brief |
FID-013 |
Religious representation and omission in everyday guidance | seed |
benchmark design, domain reviewers | brief |
FID-014 |
Conversion and proselytization symmetry | seed |
prompt design, interfaith review | brief |
FID-018 |
Spiritual companionship, dependency, and overvalidation | seed |
pastoral care, psychology, HAI research | brief |
FID-019 |
Cross-lingual and minority-faith evaluation | seed |
multilingual reviewers, dataset design | brief |
FID-020 |
Community co-design and faith-AI governance | seed |
participatory design, institutional partners | brief |
FID-021 |
Post-deployment monitoring for faith-facing AI | seed |
monitoring design, privacy review | brief |
FID-022 |
Procurement and readiness standards for faith institutions | seed |
institutional policy, legal review | brief |
FID-023 |
Faith-facing red-team suite | seed |
red-team design, safety reviewers | brief |
FID-024 |
Faith-AI incident database | seed |
taxonomy design, reporting governance | brief |
FID-051 |
Economic disruption and religious meaning-seeking | seed |
sociology of religion, labor economics, privacy-preserving measurement, aggregate usage analysis | brief |
FID-052 |
AI as private first counsel during economic stress | seed |
pastoral care, HAI research, mental health boundaries, privacy-preserving measurement | brief |
FID-053 |
AI as bridge or substitute for faith community | seed |
sociology of religion, pastoral care, UX research, aggregate and field measurement | brief |
FID-064 |
Collective intelligence and communal discernment under AI mediation | seed |
computational social science, theology of discernment, network science, organizational research | brief |
FID-066 |
AI gatekeepers, conscience, and associational pluralism | seed |
technology governance, law and religion, platform research, pluralism and safety review | brief |
FID-069 |
Verifiable delegation and revocation in multi-agent networks | seed |
multi-agent safety, identity infrastructure, authorization, high-trust institutions | brief |
FID-070 |
Contextual integrity and prompt-injection resilience for faith-facing agents | seed |
agent security, adversarial evaluation, context integrity, secure tool use | brief |
FID-071 |
Confidential agent memory and cross-context disclosure | seed |
privacy-preserving AI, agent memory evaluation, data governance, high-trust systems | brief |
These ideas are cross-faith by default and focus on source fidelity, bounded inference, formal constraints, and authority boundaries. Christian examples can serve as concrete pilots, but the methods should be useful across traditions where sacred texts, interpretive sources, and community authority matter.
See
research/formal-verification-faith-facing-ai.md
for the program note that maps these ideas into four buildable artifacts: a
faith verification domain pack, a proof-carrying faith answer schema, a sacred
text fidelity benchmark, and a reviewer-to-spec workflow.
| ID | Idea | Status | Primary need | Brief |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FID-056 |
Formal verification for sacred text fidelity | seed |
formal methods, sacred text scholarship, citation evaluation | brief |
FID-057 |
Proof-carrying citations for faith-facing AI | seed |
formal methods, RAG systems, evidence graphs, evaluator tooling | brief |
FID-058 |
Tradition-specific constraint formalization | seed |
formal specification, theology, pluralism, evaluator design | brief |
FID-059 |
Authority-boundary verification for pastoral-adjacent AI | seed |
authority boundaries, pastoral care, formal policy checks | brief |
FID-060 |
Cross-faith sacred text and source schema | seed |
source metadata, corpus design, theological librarianship | brief |
FID-061 |
Theological contradiction and entailment stress tests | seed |
natural language inference, theology review, benchmark design | brief |
FID-062 |
Verified retrieval pipelines for faith-facing RAG | seed |
RAG evaluation, retrieval verification, source authority metadata | brief |
FID-063 |
Human-reviewer-to-formal-spec translation | seed |
reviewer operations, formal specification, evaluation science | brief |
Research ideas are hypotheses and collaboration invitations. They are not Fide AI findings. A public claim requires a separate reviewed report, benchmark release, paper, or evidence artifact with methods, limitations, and named evaluation conditions.
Read CLAIMS_POLICY.md before citing, summarizing, or
promoting an idea from this repository.