In the generalized eigenvalue problem Ax = λBx where B' = B and B ≥ 0 is makes sense to obtain a Schur decomp with the <x, y> = dot(x, B * y) (semi-)inner product.
Also, some care has to be taken to remove "infinite" eigenvalues: after the shift and invert transformation (A - σB)⁻¹Bx = xθ where θ = 1/(λ - σ) there are x s.t. Bx = 0; transforming back λ = σ + 1/θ would lead to λ = ∞.
Looks like ARPACK uses some daunting looking "purification" process to remove these eigenvalues, but there is also this reference [1] which seems easier.
[1] Meerbergen, Karl, and Alastair Spence. "Implicitly restarted Arnoldi with purification for the shift-invert transformation." Mathematics of Computation of the American Mathematical Society 66.218 (1997): 667-689.
In the generalized eigenvalue problem
Ax = λBxwhereB' = BandB ≥ 0is makes sense to obtain a Schur decomp with the<x, y> = dot(x, B * y)(semi-)inner product.Also, some care has to be taken to remove "infinite" eigenvalues: after the shift and invert transformation
(A - σB)⁻¹Bx = xθwhereθ = 1/(λ - σ)there arexs.t. Bx = 0; transforming backλ = σ + 1/θwould lead toλ = ∞.Looks like ARPACK uses some daunting looking "purification" process to remove these eigenvalues, but there is also this reference [1] which seems easier.
[1] Meerbergen, Karl, and Alastair Spence. "Implicitly restarted Arnoldi with purification for the shift-invert transformation." Mathematics of Computation of the American Mathematical Society 66.218 (1997): 667-689.