Skip to content

Add AI usage/automation policy #1391

@bact

Description

@bact

Recent issues and PRs are likely to be generated mechanically.
We may need to have clear policy on this.

My personal view on this:

  • In general, we should not against a well-understood technology that can offload some of our repetitive work.
  • At the same time, we should be guarded against massive amount of geneated issues and PRs that will drain maintainers' capacity to properly review.
  • At the very least, I would suggest that the issue/PR summary should be written by human. So it will express genuine concern for an issue or demonstrate understanding of the proposed changes. Any use of AI tool should be declared (the use of Copilot review is explicit in itself, as GitHub interface will show it as reviewer or in some case a co-author).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationimprove documentation and test cases

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions