Hello,
I was testing out your pipeline to see if it would be compatible with how we currently run our demuxing, and ran into some issues. Here is the command:
nextflow run csawye01/nf-core-demultiplex \
-profile docker \
--samplesheet 190617_NB501961_0254_AHCYVWBGXB.csv \
--runfolder /mnt/SEQS/NextSeq-01/190617_NB501961_0254_AHCYVWBGXB \
--outdir /mnt/ibm_lg/olga/demux/190617_NB501961_0254_AHCYVWBGXB \
-work-dir /mnt/ibm_lg/olga/nextflow-intermediates/demux \
--awsregion us-west-2 \
-latest --max_cpus 32 --max_memory 512.GB
N E X T F L O W ~ version 19.04.1
Pulling csawye01/nf-core-demultiplex ...
downloaded from https://github.com/csawye01/nf-core-demultiplex.git
Launching `csawye01/nf-core-demultiplex` [marvelous_lovelace] - revision: 87ccff9190 [master]
ERROR ~ String index out of range: -1
-- Check script 'main.nf' at line: 95 or see '.nextflow.log' file for more details
I tracked it down to here where the samplesheet folder name is used for the run name (which I think is not flexible to all possible workflows, but a separate issue), but since there's no folder name
But if one adds a ./ before the samplesheet CSV, then it runs fine!
nextflow run csawye01/nf-core-demultiplex \
-profile docker \
--samplesheet ./190617_NB501961_0254_AHCYVWBGXB.csv \
--runfolder /mnt/SEQS/NextSeq-01/190617_NB501961_0254_AHCYVWBGXB \
--outdir /mnt/ibm_lg/olga/demux/190617_NB501961_0254_AHCYVWBGXB \
-work-dir /mnt/ibm_lg/olga/nextflow-intermediates/demux \
--awsregion us-west-2 \
-latest --max_cpus 32 --max_memory 512.GB
N E X T F L O W ~ version 19.04.1
Pulling csawye01/nf-core-demultiplex ...
Launching `csawye01/nf-core-demultiplex` [special_pauling] - revision: 87ccff9190 [master]
[2m----------------------------------------------------
,--./,-.
___ __ __ __ ___ /,-._.--~'
|\ | |__ __ / ` / \ |__) |__ } {
| \| | \__, \__/ | \ |___ \`-._,-`-,
`._,._,'
nf-core/demultiplex v1.0dev
----------------------------------------------------
Pipeline Release : master
Run Name : special_pauling
10X Genome Dir : ./tenx
Adapter Stringency : 0.9
Barcode Mismatch : 0
Skip Missing BCLs : true
Skip Missing Filter : true
Skip Missing Positions: true
Min Trim Read Length : 35
Mask Short Adapt Reads: 22
FastQ Compress Level : 4
Max Resources : 512.GB memory, 32 cpus, 10d time per job
Container : docker - drpatelh/nf-core-demultiplex:dev
Output dir : /mnt/ibm_lg/olga/demux/190617_NB501961_0254_AHCYVWBGXB
Launch dir : /home/olga/code/demux-workflows/NextSeq-01
Working dir : /mnt/ibm_lg/olga/nextflow-intermediates/demux
Script dir : /home/olga/.nextflow/assets/csawye01/nf-core-demultiplex
User : olga
Config Profile : docker
[2m----------------------------------------------------
Seems like there's likely a way around this, but I wasn't able to look into it.
Warmest,
Olga
Hello,
I was testing out your pipeline to see if it would be compatible with how we currently run our demuxing, and ran into some issues. Here is the command:
I tracked it down to here where the samplesheet folder name is used for the run name (which I think is not flexible to all possible workflows, but a separate issue), but since there's no folder name
But if one adds a
./before the samplesheet CSV, then it runs fine!Seems like there's likely a way around this, but I wasn't able to look into it.
Warmest,
Olga