Noise helps. Disorder helps more. And it works almost universally.
In quantum systems, environmental noise is usually the enemy — it destroys coherence and scrambles information. But in the right conditions, noise does something counterintuitive: it helps excitation get from A to B.
This is Environment-Assisted Quantum Transport (ENAQT). It was proposed in 2009 to explain how photosynthesis achieves near-perfect efficiency despite operating in a warm, wet, noisy cell. Too little noise → quantum interference traps the excitation. Too much → the system freezes (quantum Zeno effect). At just the right level, noise opens transport channels that pure quantum mechanics closes.
This repository documents a systematic computational study of that effect.
1. The framework is exact. We validated an analytical Lindblad model against 1,000 numerically exact simulations from the QD3SET-1 database. Agreement is at machine precision (error < 10⁻¹⁵). The math is right.
2. The sink is what makes it real. Without an irreversible "reaction center" that permanently captures arriving excitation, ENAQT is a subtle 1.27× effect. Add the sink and it jumps to 7.20× — the same physics, but now you're measuring actual transfer efficiency instead of just thermalization rate.
3. Longer chains are better, in a specific way. In a linear energy funnel, enhancement grows almost linearly with chain length (~2.12× per site added) up to about N = 15. But longer chains also need gentler noise — the optimal dephasing rate falls as N⁻¹·²⁴. The actual FMO-7 photosynthetic complex achieves 32.1× at a dephasing rate that falls squarely within the biological room-temperature window. Evolution found the sweet spot.
4. Disorder makes it stronger — not weaker. This one surprised us. We ran 100 random disorder configurations for each chain length. ENAQT appeared in 95–100% of all of them. And at large N, random disorder outperforms the carefully designed energy funnel:
| Chain length | Ordered funnel | Disordered median | Disordered mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| N = 7 | 22.8× | 8.9× | 97× |
| N = 10 | 32.4× | 35.7× | 595× |
| N = 15 | 37.9× | 244× | 6,916× |
The reason: disorder creates Anderson localization — it traps excitation in the coherent limit — making the noise-assisted route look even more miraculous by comparison. The mean grows as σ⁵⁻⁶ with disorder strength. Structural heterogeneity isn't the enemy of quantum transport. It's a resource.
| File | What it does |
|---|---|
enaqt_sb_analysis.py |
Loads 1,000 HEOM trajectories, validates the Lindblad model |
enaqt_sb_sink.py |
Adds the reaction center sink, sweeps energy bias and sink rate |
enaqt_nsite_chain.py |
Scales to N = 2–20 sites, fits scaling laws, benchmarks FMO-7 |
enaqt_disorder_ensemble.py |
100-seed disorder ensemble + disorder strength sweep (~60s) |
PAPER_ENAQT_DRAFT.md |
Full paper draft (submission-ready) |
main.tex + references.bib |
LaTeX source for journal/preprint submission |
Each script is self-contained and writes figures + a JSON results file when run.
pip install numpy scipy matplotlib
python enaqt_sb_sink.py # no external data needed
python enaqt_nsite_chain.py # no external data needed
python enaqt_disorder_ensemble.py # no external data needed, ~60sThe first script (enaqt_sb_analysis.py) requires the QD3SET-1 spin-boson
dataset — download from
figshare and place the
.npy files in ../SB/data/.
| Figure | Script | Output file |
|---|---|---|
| HEOM bell curves | enaqt_sb_analysis.py |
enaqt_sb_analysis.png |
| Sink vs. no-sink | enaqt_sb_sink.py |
enaqt_sink_vs_nosink.png |
| N-site scaling | enaqt_nsite_chain.py |
enaqt_nsite_scaling.png |
| Disorder ensemble | enaqt_disorder_ensemble.py |
enaqt_disorder_paper_figure.png |
Preprint available on bioRxiv (link forthcoming).
@article{smith2026enaqt,
author = {Smith, Alexander},
title = {Environment-Assisted Quantum Transport in Open Quantum Chains:
Validation, Scaling Laws, and Disorder Universality},
year = {2026},
note = {bioRxiv preprint}
}This work uses the QD3SET-1 database:
Ullah et al. (2023). Frontiers in Physics 11, 1223973. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2023.1223973
And builds on the original ENAQT theory:
Rebentrost et al. (2009). New Journal of Physics 11, 033003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/3/033003