-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 108
Split initial density into to parameters with a switch on HLM side #1550
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
mvdebolskiy
wants to merge
8
commits into
NGEET:main
Choose a base branch
from
mvdebolskiy:add-init-dbh-nocomp
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+76
−31
Open
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7164f22
split init_density parameter and make it deoend on the switch
mvdebolskiy a78990c
add protection against bad param values
mvdebolskiy cc15828
address review
mvdebolskiy 44ffff1
Update main/FatesInterfaceMod.F90
mvdebolskiy 06a887f
revert init_seed
mvdebolskiy 92f414d
minor format change to json
glemieux 8937fe8
fix param order
mvdebolskiy 83cd29c
Merge tag 'sci.1.92.4_api.45.0.0' into add-init-dbh-nocomp
glemieux File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need an extra check for init_seed being positive if we are in dbh initialisation mode? There's another check right below that should catch it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can not initiate the model with 0 seed and dbh. It will crash within first few days because of the canopy. Basically you are starting with fat grown tries with no carbon?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That makes sense. I guess I was wondering if this is specific to dbh initialisation? I'm assuming the same applies if you have 0 seeds and 0 number density? So is the check here not sufficient? https://github.com/mvdebolskiy/fates/blob/a78990cfcd80856c12ec9a25d91f9df8bb409490/main/EDPftvarcon.F90#L1302
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With 0 seeds non-zero density is fine.