Skip to content

Add codeql workflow#45

Merged
tillkamppeter merged 8 commits intoOpenPrinting:masterfrom
n0y0nD:add-codeql-workflow
Mar 30, 2026
Merged

Add codeql workflow#45
tillkamppeter merged 8 commits intoOpenPrinting:masterfrom
n0y0nD:add-codeql-workflow

Conversation

@n0y0nD
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@n0y0nD n0y0nD commented Mar 26, 2026

This PR adds a CodeQL advanced workflow for the pappl-retrofit repository to enable automated security analysis.
The workflow runs on each push and pull request targeting the master branch, and performs static analysis for C/C++ code using GitHub CodeQL.
It includes:
∙ CodeQL initialization and analysis setup
∙ Build steps using ./configure and make
∙ Required dependencies: libcups2-dev, libppd-dev (via apt) and PAPPL v1.4.10 (built from source, pinned to v1.x for API compatibility)
This improves code quality and helps detect potential security vulnerabilities early in the development process.

@n0y0nD n0y0nD force-pushed the add-codeql-workflow branch from cbeaba3 to dfb2792 Compare March 29, 2026 21:21
@github-advanced-security
Copy link
Copy Markdown

You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool.

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

  • The 'Security' tab will display more code scanning analysis results (e.g., for the default branch).
  • Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results.
  • You will be able to see the analysis results for the pull request's branch on this overview once the scans have completed and the checks have passed.

For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation.

@tillkamppeter tillkamppeter merged commit bf505c5 into OpenPrinting:master Mar 30, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants