pytest evaluation

[alekseyborisyukvalidas]

Added tool evaluation for pytest
1 use case: Run tests and generate test report
added safety measures where availbale

[github-actions]

⚠️ Docs-as-Code version mismatch detected
Please check the CI build logs for details and align the documentation version with the Bazel dependency.

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

We are also using pytest (but also other test frameworks) to facilitate the traceability to tests.
I'm unsure if this has / should play into here.

[alekseyborisyukvalidas]

We are also using pytest (but also other test frameworks) to facilitate the traceability to tests. I'm unsure if this has / should play into here.

@MaximilianSoerenPollak, if you could give me the list of these frameworks and where/how they used, i can extend the existing tool list

[AlexanderLanin]

does this say "yes" to there is an impact on detection or there is a detection? Where can I find the detection? Is "Check test run status" the entire detection description? Unfortunately, I have no idea what that means

[alekseyborisyukvalidas]

This "yes" is to "Impact safety detection sufficient?"

[alekseyborisyukvalidas]

Pytest is only part of ITF and not supposed to used independently according to: https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/platform_management_plan/software_verification.html

[MaximilianSoerenPollak]

Pytest is only part of ITF and not supposed to used independently according to: https://eclipse-score.github.io/score/main/platform_management_plan/software_verification.html

Many repositories use it themselfs see here:

https://github.com/eclipse-score/docs-as-code/blob/main/src/extensions/score_source_code_linker/tests/
https://github.com/eclipse-score/persistency/tree/main/tests/test_cases/tests

Etc.

So if this is truly the case, then these all need to be updated & changed.
I was not aware of such restriction.

@AlexanderLanin does this ring a bell for you?
Not sure who else to tag / ask here.

[github-actions]

Thanks for the pull request. This thread has been quiet for 30 days, so we are marking it as stale for now. Please take a quick look and let us know whether it is still up to date, still relevant, needs review, or is ready to merge. Any new activity will remove the stale label automatically. If nothing changes in the next 10 days, we will close it to keep the backlog current.

[anmittag]

Why two "Test reports" as outcome?