Skip to content

docs(eudi): pitch deck — Consent Wallet for the EHDS (use-case track)#73

Open
ma3u wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/eudi-hackathon-pitch-deck
Open

docs(eudi): pitch deck — Consent Wallet for the EHDS (use-case track)#73
ma3u wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/eudi-hackathon-pitch-deck

Conversation

@ma3u

@ma3u ma3u commented Jun 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Pitch deck — Consent Wallet for the EHDS (EUDI Wallet Hackathon, use-case track)

Deliverable for issue #72 (use case / pitch), backed by the implementation in #22.

What's here

docs/submissions/eudi-wallet-hackathon-2026/

  • EUDI-Consent-Wallet-Pitch.pdf — 9 × 16:9 slides (hero + 8), real product screenshots on the cold-open, demo and why-us slides.
  • speaker-notes.md — 3-minute timing plan, per-slide notes, a Q&A defense crib, and a real-vs-roadmap table.
  • deck.json + make_deck.js — content-agnostic renderer (deck.jsondeck.html → PDF via the repo's ui Playwright). Edit deck.json, re-run.
  • README.md — file map + regeneration + provenance.

How it was made

Multi-agent workflow: 3 framings (demo-first / regulation-first / citizen-story) → 4-persona jury (SPRIND innovation · BSI/eIDAS security · EHDS health-policy · pitch coach) → synthesisadversarial regulatory fact-check.

Material correction the fact-check caught

The synthesized draft framed EHDS secondary use as GDPR Art. 9(2)(a) opt-in consent gated by the wallet — which is wrong and would be fatal in front of a BSI/health-policy jury. EHDS Chapter IV secondary use is actually HDAB-permit + a citizen opt-out right (no reason needed; opt-in consent is mainly for genetic data). Verified independently against the European Commission and legal sources.

The deck now frames the wallet as the citizen's verifiable channel to exercise their EHDS rights (opt-out by default, consent where the law requires) — not the legal basis. Revocation is framed honestly as an auditable access-boundary re-check (cryptographic status-list = roadmap), the verifier as the hosted EUDI reference verifier, and scope as a static schema today (dynamic per-study = roadmap).

All data synthetic; all orgs fictional (AlphaKlinik Berlin, PharmaCo Research AG, MedReg DE).

Closes part of #72.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…72)

9-slide 16:9 deck + speaker notes for the EUDI Wallet Hackathon use-case/pitch track.
Drafted via a multi-agent workflow (3 framings -> 4-persona jury -> synthesis ->
adversarial fact-check). Fact-check corrected a material legal framing: EHDS Ch. IV
secondary use is HDAB-permit + opt-out, not GDPR Art. 9(2)(a) opt-in consent; the
wallet exercises the citizen's opt-out/consent right, it is not the legal basis.
Revocation framed honestly as an auditable access-boundary re-check (status-list is
roadmap). Includes a Q&A defense crib and a content-agnostic deck.json -> PDF renderer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant