-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
ci/cirrus: use Go 1.19.x not 1.19 #3814
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we have
jqas option, we could use the JSON feed; https://go.dev/dl/?mode=json&include=stableThere's probably some docs somewhere about that URL (it looks like
include=stableonly returns stable versions, and the first entry would have the version at least (but first entry is "source", so we probably need to filter on os/arch).There's some scripts used for the official Golang image on Docker Hub that may be useful; https://github.com/docker-library/golang/blob/e8e87a35e7de2343770e13ec1b6c62cafb95728d/versions.sh
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I found the docs! https://pkg.go.dev/golang.org/x/website/internal/dl
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The bash and friends version was not that bad though...
but jq is the king as it's much more structured and thus bulletproof.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah! I was looking at the source code (spotted that @tianon added a link in that script). Was even considering if we could contribute a query-argument to filter the results by (major.minor)
version. The code looks pretty straightforward, and I can envision such a query-parameter being useful for many purposes (includinggo-setup-actionThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed! I was mostly concerned it the HTML output was stable enough, and JSON is more structured / stable in that respect.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yep, I'd rather use something like
wget https://go.dev/dl/?version=1.20&os=linux&arch=amd64&kind=archiveand be done with it.Found a semi-relevant issue: golang/go#34864. Judging by it, it would be quite hard to move forward with a change like that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Casually stealing that link and adding to the script so I can find it again later 😂 ❤️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, generally most proposals would end up with "Based on the discussion above, this proposal seems like a likely decline"
But just looking at the code, it feels like adding additional filters wouldn't do much harm (and for sure wouldn't break backward compatibility); https://github.com/golang/website/blob/41e922072f17ab2826d9479338314c025602a3a1/internal/dl/server.go#L173-L183