-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
rhwa/sbr: update RELATED_IMAGE_SBR_AGENT only if missing #79603
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
clobrano
wants to merge
1
commit into
openshift:main
Choose a base branch
from
clobrano:feat/sbr-update-related-image-agent-if-exists
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+19
−4
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: openshift/release
Length of output: 189
Handle multiple matching env indices to avoid invalid JSON patch paths
If more than one
RELATED_IMAGE_SBR_AGENTentry exists, the jq expression returns multiple indices (e.g.,0and2), soENV_INDEXbecomes multi-line (0\n2). That makes the JSON patchpathinvalid (e.g.,/.../env/0\n2/value) and the patch can fail instead of converging.Suggested fix
📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If more than one entry exists the CSV is invalid. This change is made exactly to avoid adding duplicates.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
@clobrano, that's a fair point — a CSV with duplicate environment variable entries is already malformed, and handling that corrupted state is outside the scope of this PR. The idempotent logic here is designed precisely to prevent that from ever happening, so the single-index assumption is correct for any valid CSV. I'll dismiss this concern.🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 302
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 5449
🏁 Script executed:
Length of output: 266
@clobrano, that's a valid point — a CSV with duplicateRELATED_IMAGE_SBR_AGENTentries would already be malformed, and this PR is specifically designed to prevent that situation. The single-index assumption is correct for any well-formed CSV. I'll dismiss my concern.(I wasn't able to resolve the review thread programmatically due to permission restrictions, but you can resolve it manually on the PR.)
🧠 Learnings used