fix(ms-bing-capi): do not fail batched events on validation warnings#3863
Open
scottlepich-lz wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
fix(ms-bing-capi): do not fail batched events on validation warnings#3863scottlepich-lz wants to merge 1 commit into
scottlepich-lz wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
The sendEvent action sends events with `continueOnValidationError: true`, so Microsoft's CAPI accepts an event (HTTP 200, `eventsReceived: 1`) even when it has non-fatal issues, and reports those issues as entries in `error.details[]` flagged with `"isWarning": true`. The batch response handler (`performBatch`) matched `error.details[]` by `index` only and treated ANY matching detail as a hard failure. As a result, a batched event whose only detail was a warning was marked `status: 400` and reported as a failed delivery, even though Microsoft had accepted it. This caused real, silent delivery failures for any batched event that triggered a Microsoft warning. (Single `perform` returns the raw 200, so the bug only manifested in batching.) Fix: only treat a detail as a failure when it is NOT a warning (`detail.index === index && !detail.isWarning`). A warning-only event is now marked SUCCESS (200); an event with a real (non-warning) error at its index is still marked 400. `types.ts` is extended to model the `isWarning` and `errorCode` fields the API actually returns. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Note
Copilot couldn't run its full agentic review because no GitHub Actions runner was available. Make sure your repository has a runner available to run Copilot's review, or add a copilot-setup-steps.yml file specifying one with the runs-on attribute. See the docs for more details.
Fixes batched sendEvent handling for Microsoft Bing CAPI responses so that validation warnings (accepted events) don’t get incorrectly reported as failed deliveries.
Changes:
- Update batch error matching to ignore
error.details[]entries flagged withisWarning: true - Extend the multi-status response detail typings with
errorCodeandisWarning - Add unit tests covering warning-only vs non-warning detail behavior in batch responses
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| packages/destination-actions/src/destinations/ms-bing-capi/sendEvent/types.ts | Extends response typings to include errorCode / isWarning on error.details[] entries. |
| packages/destination-actions/src/destinations/ms-bing-capi/sendEvent/index.ts | Adjusts batch indexing logic to treat warning-only details as success. |
| packages/destination-actions/src/destinations/ms-bing-capi/sendEvent/tests/sendEvent.test.ts | Adds batch unit tests to prevent regressions around warning vs error detail handling. |
Comment on lines
61
to
66
| propertyName: string | ||
| attemptedValue: unknown | ||
| errorMessage: string | ||
| errorCode?: string | ||
| isWarning?: boolean | ||
| }> |
|
|
||
| payloads.forEach((payload, index) => { | ||
| const error = details.find((detail) => detail.index === index) | ||
| const error = details.find((detail) => detail.index === index && !detail.isWarning) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
The Microsoft Bing CAPI
sendEventaction sends events withcontinueOnValidationError: true, which means Microsoft's CAPI accepts an event (HTTP200,eventsReceived: 1) even when it has non-fatal issues, and reports those issues as entries inerror.details[]flagged with"isWarning": true.The batch response handler (
performBatch) matchederror.details[]byindexonly and treated ANY matching detail as a hard failure. As a result, a batched event whose only detail was a warning was markedstatus: 400and reported back to Segment as a failed delivery, even though Microsoft had already accepted it. This caused real, silent delivery failures for any batched event that triggered a Microsoft warning.The single-event
performpath returns the raw200response, so the bug only manifested in batching.Example real response detail (Microsoft returns
200with):{ "errorCode": "Empty", "errorMessage": "'price' must not be empty.", "index": 0, "isWarning": true, "propertyName": "data[0].customData.items[0].price" }Fix
index.ts: only treat a detail as a failure when it is not a warning —details.find((detail) => detail.index === index && !detail.isWarning). A warning-only event is now marked SUCCESS (200); an event with a real (non-warning) error at its index is still marked400.continueOnValidationError: trueand theperform/performBatchstructure are unchanged.types.ts: extended theMSMultiStatusResponse.error.details[]element type with the fields the API actually returns (isWarning?: boolean,errorCode?: string).No
generated-types.tschange — this is response handling, not fields.Testing
Added
performBatchunit tests proving:200response with anisWarning: truedetail at an event's index -> that event is a SUCCESS (200), not a400;isWarning: false) at an index -> that event is still marked400, while a warning at a different index stays200;isWarningfield -> defaults to a real failure (400), preserving existing behavior.Ran only the ms-bing-capi tests (
jest src/destinations/ms-bing-capi): 18 passed, 18 total. Typecheck and ESLint on the changed files are clean; Prettier reports no formatting issues.Security Review
Related
Sibling to the item-price fix in #3859 (#3859), which addresses a separate issue in the same destination. This PR does not depend on or touch that change.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code