-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 430
[DRAFT] [WIP] Add in builtin listener for token revoked and app uninstalled events #2337
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from 1 commit
011fcd4
a6491ac
f4fa2d3
7f70036
6b549f0
d19f686
bf058dc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ | ||
| import { InstallationStore, InstallationQuery } from "@slack/oauth"; | ||
| import { Logger } from '@slack/logger'; | ||
| import { Context } from "../types"; | ||
|
|
||
| export class TokenRevocationListeners { | ||
| private installationStore: InstallationStore; | ||
| private logger: Logger; | ||
|
|
||
| public constructor(installationStore: InstallationStore, logger: Logger) { | ||
| this.installationStore = installationStore; | ||
| this.logger = logger; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public handleTokensRevokedEvents(context: Context) { | ||
| const isEnterpriseInstall = context.isEnterpriseInstall; | ||
|
|
||
| const installQuery: InstallationQuery<typeof isEnterpriseInstall> = { | ||
| isEnterpriseInstall: isEnterpriseInstall, | ||
| teamId: isEnterpriseInstall ? context.teamId : undefined, | ||
| enterpriseId: isEnterpriseInstall ? context.enterpriseId : undefined | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| this.installationStore.deleteInstallation(installQuery, this.logger); | ||
|
|
||
| // add logic to delete bot? | ||
|
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @seratch wrote this while referencing the Python and Java PRs, wanted to see if these functions / this class was on the right track for what we're trying to accomplish. I did notice that Java and Python have a
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There are two approaches:
[Aligning with bolt-java/python] Aligning with bolt-python/java should be the safest, most clear, and flexible approach:
Review https://github.com/slackapi/bolt-python/blob/v1.21.2/slack_bolt/listener/builtins.py to better understand why bolt-python/java have three methods. I don't believe this can cause any confusion. If a developer has already implemented the deleteInstallation method, bolt-js never calls the method without a user_id, so adding built-in support should not break anything. When we release this built-in listener support, we should mention the necessity of two more method implementation, though. [Opting for a simpler but more inflexible approach] If we try to only use deleteInstallation, the method can function in the following ways:
This approach should also work, but the downside is that when an app does not want to delete user tokens while deleting a bot token, deleteInstallation with enterprise/team_id does not behave this way. While Bolt supports user-token-only use cases, we generally recommend having a bot token to enable many functionalities. Deleting a bot token usually means the app is no longer being used in the workspace. So, deleting all tokens when a bot token is revoked makes sense to many apps. With that being said, this inflexibility may limit developers options. Also, our platform intentionally provides two event types to differentiate the scenarios a single token revocation vs app uninstallation. I recommend [Aligning with bolt-java/python], but am open to any alternatives including the second option here. @filmaj do you have any option on this?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@seratch Personally I like the first option! Does this mean to proceed with the first option, we'll need to release a new
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed 👍
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @hello-ashleyintech yes, you're right! |
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| public handleAppUninstalledEvents(context: Context) { | ||
| const isEnterpriseInstall = context.isEnterpriseInstall; | ||
|
|
||
| const installQuery: InstallationQuery<typeof isEnterpriseInstall> = { | ||
| isEnterpriseInstall: isEnterpriseInstall, | ||
| teamId: isEnterpriseInstall ? context.teamId : undefined, | ||
| enterpriseId: isEnterpriseInstall ? context.enterpriseId : undefined | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| this.installationStore.deleteInstallation(installQuery, this.logger); | ||
|
|
||
| // add logic to delete bot? | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.