Adding some more land-use-change and globally-relevant history variables#1485
Conversation
…r LUC-associated fire
|
After applying the suggested fixes above, I'm getting B4B results against the current baseline, but I'm seeing the Here's the top part of the error output: More of the output can be found in the case output here: |
I determined that I accidentally introduced an error when I applied 632a127. This is corrected via 2680f31. |
|
Regression testing against Results: |
| if (((ccohort%c_area + crown_area_covered)/cpatch%area) .ge. 0.05_r8 ) then | ||
| hio_patch_weighted_95thpctile_height_si(io_si) = & | ||
| hio_patch_weighted_95thpctile_height_si(io_si) + ccohort%height * cpatch%area/AREA | ||
| ccohort => null() ! exit the cohort loop |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Linking @rgknox comment here: #1529 (comment) since I'm closing #1529
This pull request passes HLM biophysical landuse variables into fates to by output as diagnostic variables along FATES dimensions. Thefates_cold_luh2 test mod is updated to include these new diagnostic variables. This also updates the fates_cold_allvars testmod to include new history variables added with NGEET/fates#1485. This PR is the ELM-side code changes associated with FATES PR NGEET/fates#1536. [B4B]
This pull request passes HLM biophysical landuse variables into fates to by output as diagnostic variables along FATES dimensions. Thefates_cold_luh2 test mod is updated to include these new diagnostic variables. This also updates the fates_cold_allvars testmod to include new history variables added with NGEET/fates#1485. This PR is the ELM-side code changes associated with FATES PR NGEET/fates#1536. [non-BFB] for FATES due to field lists
This PR adds a few variables that I wanted to use for the TRENDY runs and/or global calibration.
Description:
These new variables include:
In the interest of cleanup, this PR also gets rid of a few history variables:
Collaborators:
@mpaiao, @JessicaNeedham
Expectation of Answer Changes:
should not be answer-changing except for the different variables (though perhaps roundoff level changes to fire and downstream fluxes like NBP because order of operations changed?)
Checklist
If this is your first time contributing, please read the CONTRIBUTING document.
All checklist items must be checked to enable merging this pull request:
Contributor
Integrator
If satellite phenology regressions are not b4b, please hold merge and notify the FATES development team.
Documentation
Test Results:
Not yet tested here. I cherry-picked all of these from my working branch, so it is possible there are conflicts that I didn't catch.
CTSM (or) E3SM (specify which) test hash-tag:
CTSM (or) E3SM (specify which) baseline hash-tag:
FATES baseline hash-tag:
Test Output: